Vitamin premix overages: why the label claim is never the batch formula
Every vitamin premix is dosed above its label claim. How much above is a decision with cost, stability and compliance riding on it — and it belongs in writing before production.
Vitamin stability is not one problem. Fat-soluble vitamins fail by oxidation; water-soluble ones fail mostly through moisture and pH. The controls that protect one do very little for the other.
These degrade primarily through oxidation, accelerated by light, heat and metal ions. Commercial forms are engineered around that:
These are dominated by moisture, and secondarily by pH and by interactions with each other:
Vitamin C and copper together will destroy each other's assay faster than either degrades alone. Iron accelerates the loss of A, C and folate. Separating reactive components — by coating, by granulation, or by putting them in different layers or different products — is standard practice, and it is a formulation decision that has to be made before the premix is specified, not after.
A well-chosen stabilised form is wasted if the drum is opened repeatedly in a humid warehouse. Whatever storage condition the stability data assumes is the condition the material actually needs — the specification is a promise about handling as much as about the ingredient.
Every vitamin premix is dosed above its label claim. How much above is a decision with cost, stability and compliance riding on it — and it belongs in writing before production.
Magnesium oxide and magnesium bisglycinate are priced per kilo of compound but formulated per milligram of elemental mineral. Confusing the two is the most expensive arithmetic error in mineral sourcing.
The same amino acid reaches the market by three different manufacturing routes. They differ in isomer purity, allergen risk and which certifications they can carry.